June 2008 Archives
Remember when your babies were newborns and you had that moment of “what on earth am I doing with a BABY?! What was I thinking?! I don’t have a clue what to do with this little human!?”
Well, NBC is filming it all – freakouts, tears, panic, joy and relief – as six teenaged couples tackle parenting with borrowed babies in the new reality TV show The Baby Borrowers. These couples are all 18 and older, so they are barely teenagers and in established relationships with their partners.
The babies – the poor babies – have been loaned by willing parents who can watch the happenings from live video feed in a neighboring house. I’m not entirely clear why anyone would loan their baby to strangers, but these folks did.
My colleagues at the National Parent Education Network are understandably very worried about these babies being cared for by strangers (don’t worry, there’s an unfamiliar “professional nanny” lurking in the back ground and the parents can come intervene at a moment’s notice). And the babies are very distressed, there is no doubt about that.
I wonder if the ends justify the means.
Most of the teens think they can handle the rigors of a baby. They are excited to try practice parenting and are looking forward to feeling closer to their partners and exploring what it might be like “someday” with their own babies.
Interestingly, some of the teens fall apart within the first 24-48 hours before the baby shows up. Once the baby makes the scene all of the couples are clearly under duress – they really don’t know what they are doing – and any cockiness has completely disappeared.
“Parenting” is clearly way more difficult than these kids had imagined and by the time the babies are put to bed – most asleep in their care givers arms – the teens have had it.
They are exhausted, punchy, crabby and stressed. I’d bet every one of them would give it up and go back to their real lives in a heartbeat.
They’ve had the babies for 12 hours.
This show is a walking, talking teachable moment. Any parent who has kids 12 and older should watch at least one episode so their kids can see what it’s like to be fully responsible for a baby.
Then, as a family, a conversation should follow about what their kids’ plans for the future hold, what their goals are and how they can make their dreams happen.
Anyone can make a baby. It takes significantly more work to be a parent.
I was wondering where he stood on sex education and now I know! He's all for kids having medically accurate, comprehensive sexuality edcuation from an early age. Ahhh...reason.
Read more here...
http://www.siecus.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Feature.showFeature&CategoryID=34&FeatureID=1149
What alarming news out of Massachusetts today - 17 pregnant teen-aged girls at one high school.
Half of the pregnancies were intentional.
Even more alarming was the interview with the principal. His theory is that these girls don’t see any future for themselves, so they get pregnant so they will have something to do and feel important.
I feel for these girls, who don’t have the support to make better decisions for themselves. When I listened to the Principal I had to wonder – isn’t it part of the schools’ job to help these girls find something to give their lives meaning?
I realize the school isn’t wholly responsible for these girls’ lives, but they do have the opportunity to help them see more for their futures, which can include parenting, but shouldn’t be the first thing on the list.
I worry that Jamie Lynn Spears and the movie Juno have glamorized teen pregnancy and make it seem like a reasonable life choice. Media makes it look so easy and when parents are able to give their girls what they need in terms of self esteem and sound decision making skills, it’s not surprising choosing to have a baby seems like a good idea.
We chose not to circumcise Milo and since the other penis at our house is circumcised, we didn't really know what to do with Milo's tinkle-waggle! Now we know, thanks to this great and helpful website for parents of boys!
http://www.babyboy.info/parents.html
"Intact? Don't retract!" Sums up their advice.
Yesterday, I went to the movies with my big brother, Tom. We went to see Ironman because, well, we both like that stuff and our spouses weren’t interested. I, by the way, will see pretty much any movie ever made…which can be a problem when the film is truly awful.
I was shocked and dismayed to see four or five kids who were probably five and under at this movie! Call me crazy, but I don’t think it’s okay for little kids to see movies about blowing people up, war and killing.
Is it just me?
I know there are parents out there who think it’s completely inappropriate for Milo to know the details of baby-making (and what a condom is – see my last post for that little tale).
But, holy cow! This movie was stuffed with real and implied violence. Stuffed! In my book, this is considerably more inappropriate and damaging to young psyches.
My favorite scene was when the bad guys were rounding up the townspeople with big-ass guns and lots of yelling and they kicked the daylights out of a dad. Then they said they were going to kill him, had him on his knees, gun pointed at his head and Our Hero flew in and saved the day!
Pleasant dreams!
I’m sure this wasn’t scary at all for those little kids. Nope, not one bit. And really, so appropriate for them to see, because, well, it’s just a movie, right? What harm can it do? Four year olds are great at discerning what’s real and what’s imaginary, right?
Ug. I wanted to say something to the guy sitting behind us, but I couldn’t figure out what to say that wouldn’t sound bitchy and mean. I am sure he took his little guy to see that movie because he wanted to see it – his boy will be fine.
A real little Ironman.
See why I didn’t say anything to him?
